Bromoil Process – Cure for White Spots

White spots have become an ever-increasing issue when making Bromoil prints, and this is not limited to one paper manufacturer. This is how you solve it.

Writer and photography / Dave Symonds FRPS EFIAP


Bromoil print Uncoated. Spots very evident.
Bromoil print. Uncoated. The spots are very evident.

Papers used for bromoil: Foma 112 & 113 & Other Papers

The problem seems to have increased over recent years and is not limited to one manufacturer. For example, older manufactured papers worked fine with the Bromoil process. However, recently manufactured papers of the exact type and make exhibit white spots upon inking. I now firmly believe that the base paper has changed in some way or other.

“The white spots are caused by water ingress through the back of the paper. I discovered this by viewing a partially inked matrix under high magnification, on a light box.”

There were the usual large white blemishes with central pin-pricks of light showing through. I couldn’t tell if the pin-prick was in the emulsion or the backing paper, so I peeled off the emulsion and viewed it again. It became evident that the fault lay in the backing paper. The cure was very simple, which was to use a sealant on the back of the matrix.

Recommended method for fixing white spots on bromoil prints

  1. Flatten the dry matrix by dampening the back and placing between 2 sheets of clean paper. Then place some heavy books on the top and leave for a couple of days. This step is important as you don’t want to seal any buckles or curves into the paper.
  2. Coat the back of the now dry and flat matrix with 2 coats of either Gesso or Liquitex (either work well). Ensure each coat is fully dry before proceeding.
  3. You can now complete the Bromoil in the normal way.
  4. I would recommend that you take the completed and still damp print, sandwich between 2 clean sheets of paper, as before, and press with books.
  5. After flattening is complete, the print can be stored or mounted, as desired.
Bromoil print. Coated. No spots evident.
Bromoil print. Coated. No spots are evident.

I’m not a lith printer but I know they have been having similar issues with some papers. I wonder if coating in this way would work for them?

Dave Symonds is a retired Lighting Designer. He holds two Associateships and a Fellowship of the Royal Photographic Society. see Dave Symonds’ gallery here and his website here.

Did you learn something?
We would like YOU to become a Supporting Member to help us keep this learning resource free and accessible to all.
 
An article takes 1-4 days to write, edit and publish. The research behind the article takes between one day and a lifetime. No one gets paid for this and your contributions and membership are crucial to help with running costs.
 
Apart from supporting our free learning and inspirational resource, you are also eligible to take part in our members-only events, all for the price of a coffee once a month.
 
Other ways to support us are buying our books, calendars and journals directly from us, or using our affiliate links to buy books which gives us a tiny percentage. You can also get a t-shirt, card or apron from our Etsy store earning us a small commission.
 
We really appreciate your support and THANK YOU to the heroes who already support us!

2 thoughts on “Bromoil Process – Cure for White Spots”

  1. Hi PJ, since writing the article, I have found out that there is only one manufacturer of photographic backing paper. If they have a problem, then this filters down to all the producers of finished photographic papers. I have now standardised on two coats of Gesso applied to the back of the print. Since adopting this method I have had no white spot problems whatsoever.

  2. Dave, I have been using Fontaine 132 and have had this problem. I have suspected contamination at each step of the process and tried to isolate the problem with no luck. My failed prints look just like your example. Thanks for the info. You can view my work on my web site pj-sturdevant.com. No examples of blotches however.

Leave a Comment